Does carbon 14 dating disprove the bible
Rare cases even include whole tissues, intact and flexible.
So far, nobody has found a way to preserve proteins for even one million years—to do so without temperatures like those liquid nitrogen might maintain would violate fundamental physics.
In several documented situations when carbon dating ran contrary to common scientific assumptions, the results were only an anomaly if the world were billions of years old.
If the earth were thousands of years old, the results of these tests would have fit in perfectly. Since the former is radioactive and decays at a constant pace while the latter is stable, the ratio between the two can determine the age of anything that was on the earth and breathed.
The reality is that the science is rather elegant in its function.
The challenge is that it operates under a set of assumptions.
For example, dozens of dinosaur and other fossils still retain remnants of their original proteins.
Fw-300 .qstn-title #ya-trending-questions-show-more, #ya-related-questions-show-more #ya-trending-questions-more, #ya-related-questions-more /* DMROS */ .
Now the most-asked questions from the highly popular New Answers Books are on video!
The more we study the behemoth of Job 40, the more convinced we become that the passage describes a then-living dinosaur.
Uninspired Bible notes suggest it was an elephant or hippo, but the description does not fit either animal.